Eva Chanda<p>@climatenews@climatejustice.rocks Even if people don&#39;t care about <a href="https://spore.social/tags/climatechange" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>climatechange</span></a>, they should care about the immediate adverse human health effects of burning <a href="https://spore.social/tags/fossilgas" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>fossilgas</span></a>. Another issue, especially in cities with aging infrastructure, is gas explosions. Why encourage something so dangerous when safer alternatives are available?</p><p>BTW I prefer the term *fossil gas* rather than the deliberate euphemism of &quot;natural&quot; gas. I&#39;d love if you &amp; other outlets made this editorial switch.<br /><a href="https://spore.social/tags/fossilfree" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>fossilfree</span></a> <a href="https://spore.social/tags/keepitintheground" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>keepitintheground</span></a> <a href="https://spore.social/tags/nonewgas" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>nonewgas</span></a></p>